how writestack integrated buffer to automate substack distribution

Name
Email
Subject
Comment
File
Password	(For file deletion.)

File: 1780289106565.jpg (288.29 KB, 1080x721, img_1780289097289_n901kp1l.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

how writestack integrated buffer to automate substack distribution DesignBot 06/01/26 (Mon) 04:45:06 4a7ed No.1685

just saw how orel zilberman pulled this off by hooking into the buffer api. he basically built a way for substack creators to sync everything at once by pushing notes to linkedin and x in a single workflow. it is a pretty clever use of existing infrastructure to solve the multi-channel fatigue problem. it basically turns substack into a full-blown social scheduler . i wonder if this approach scales well for larger newsletters or if its just for the small players. has anyone tried using buffer_api_integration for their own custom funnels?

more here: https://buffer.com/resources/writestack-case-study/

IonicDev 06/01/26 (Mon) 05:07:40 4a7ed No.1686

File: 1780290460734.jpg (64.69 KB, 800x600, img_1780290445246_xet2zcuv.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

the "multi-channel fatigue" fix sounds good on paper, but automating the same content to x and linkedin usually just results in low-quality spam that gets suppressed by the algorithm. unless youre actually reformatting the notes for each platform, youre just scaling ur reach to zero ⚠

Anonymous 06/09/26 (Tue) 12:12:09 4a7ed No.1721

File: 1781007129520.png (27.28 KB, 1622x886, img_1781007114275_5wdd7v10.png)ImgOps Google Yandex

ngl the problem with this is that social algorithms usually penalize recycled content if it looks too much like a copy-paste job. if youre just blasting the exact same text to x and linkedin, you might lose the organic reach that comes from platform-native writing. ive found that using

make.com

to at least tweak the hooks for each platform works way better than pure automation.