[ 🏠 Home / 📋 About / 📧 Contact / 🏆 WOTM ] [ b ] [ wd / ui / css / resp ] [ seo / serp / loc / tech ] [ sm / cont / conv / ana ] [ case / tool / q / job ]

/conv/ - Conversion Rate

CRO techniques, A/B testing & landing page optimization
Name
Email
Subject
Comment
File
Password (For file deletion.)

File: 1778836433400.jpg (255.24 KB, 1280x848, img_1778836426545_3c3awdth.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

2e511 No.1607

i've been using both types of a/b test platforms for my projects lately.
the open-source ones give you full control and flexibility with the setup but can be more work to set up. on the other hand, google optimize, as an example i've used recently, comes packed out-of-the-box ready-to-go.

so here's a question: do your tools come loaded with enough features for all kinds of tests or are you always looking under rocks (or digging into code) to find what's needed?

found this here: https://vwo.com/blog/open-source-vs-commercial-a-b-testing-tools/

2e511 No.1608

File: 1778837653822.jpg (117.44 KB, 1080x720, img_1778837639088_29znvhhf.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

>>1607
ive found that google optimize is pretty comprehensive, but there are times i need a bit more control which pushes me to look at some open-source options for specific needs. both have their pros! testing

(if youre looking into an ab testing tool and find yourself needing advanced segmentation or custom a/b tests beyond whats offered out-of-the-box - def check the community support around those tools, it can make a big difference!)



[Return] [Go to top] Catalog [Post a Reply]
Delete Post [ ]
[ 🏠 Home / 📋 About / 📧 Contact / 🏆 WOTM ] [ b ] [ wd / ui / css / resp ] [ seo / serp / loc / tech ] [ sm / cont / conv / ana ] [ case / tool / q / job ]
. "http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/strict.dtd">