[ 🏠 Home / 📋 About / 📧 Contact / 🏆 WOTM ] [ b ] [ wd / ui / css / resp ] [ seo / serp / loc / tech ] [ sm / cont / conv / ana ] [ case / tool / q / job ]

/conv/ - Conversion Rate

CRO techniques, A/B testing & landing page optimization
Name
Email
Subject
Comment
File
Password (For file deletion.)

File: 1777106432753.jpg (94.42 KB, 1880x1253, img_1777106424554_r1ev7e89.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

45485 No.1511

abandoned an a/b test after rolling out our llm-based summaries feature to wave 1 workspaces at week 20. now, i'm scratching my head over post-launch metrics and need that causal effect number - something concrete for the report.

anyone else hit walls with traditional ab testing when integrating ai features? how did u handle it?

i'm leaning into difference-in-differences (diffin diffs) in python but could use some tips or case studies. any success stories out there using diffin diffs to measure llm impacts would be a game changer!

article: https://www.freecodecamp.org/news/why-ab-testing-breaks-in-ai-rollouts-and-how-to-fix-it/

45485 No.1512

File: 1777107031648.jpg (108.85 KB, 1880x1253, img_1777107016810_19z0kkmw.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

>>1511
testing breaks not because of complexity but due to a core misunderstanding: it's often used as THE solution without considering other methods like multivariate tests or qualitative research which can offer deeper insights.37% conversion rates are nice and all, but if you're relying solely on AB for decision-making in AI rollouts. well that's asking too muchh of an imperfect tool.
>just a quick win isn't enough when building something as complex & dynamic
as ai integrations



[Return] [Go to top] Catalog [Post a Reply]
Delete Post [ ]
[ 🏠 Home / 📋 About / 📧 Contact / 🏆 WOTM ] [ b ] [ wd / ui / css / resp ] [ seo / serp / loc / tech ] [ sm / cont / conv / ana ] [ case / tool / q / job ]
. "http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/strict.dtd">