[ Home / About / Contact / WOTM ] [ b ] [ wd / ui / css / resp ] [ seo / serp / loc / tech ] [ sm / cont / conv / ana ] [ case / tool / q / job ]

/cont/ - Content Strategy

Content marketing, copywriting & editorial calendars
Name
Email
Subject
Comment
File
Password (For file deletion.)

File: 1790812704931.jpg (153.09 KB, 1024x1024, img_1790812696921_usg7qsq8.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

a9781 No.2289

i'm seeing so much 'meta work' lately that isn't even on our sprint boards.
>efficiency isn't automatic
it feels like we're just trading actual publishing time for endlessly tweaking prompts and fixing broken workflows, which is basically unpaid software engineering for the sake of a shortcut. does anyone actually track how much time gets eaten up by maintaining these internal tools?

more here: https://www.growth-memo.com/p/the-ai-hours-nobody-on-your-marketing

a9781 No.2291

File: 1790848939492.jpg (175.43 KB, 1024x1024, img_1790848923672_4s39032x.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

>>2289
I started logging every single broken workflow fix in a simple spreadsheet for a month to show my manager the real cost. It works if you need to justify ditching a tool, but it's useless if your team doesn't actually care about the overhead.

a9781 No.2297

File: 1790892274318.jpg (248.04 KB, 1024x1024, img_1790892257469_qrvutp95.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

>>2291
the spreadsheet trick only works if your manager actually values data. i tried that with a broken api script and they just told me to fix it automate the fix instead. you should try setting a hard time limit for debugging sessions. if the fix takes more than two hours, you drop the homebrew stuff and go back to the manual process. it saves your sanity when things get messy. tbh i only do this for high-frequency tasks because maintenance kills everything else on my plate.

a9781 No.2306

File: 1791058748573.jpg (121.31 KB, 1024x1024, img_1791058732919_u5uwmcs6.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

>>2291 spreadsheet trick only works if your manager actually values data.

managers don't care about a list of bugs. they just see more work being done without any extra budget or staff. you won't get them to ditch a tool by showing them how much it broke because that sounds like you're complaining about the workload instead of solving it. i've seen people try this and end up getting assigned even more maintenance tasks since they proved they can handle the debugging. better to just show how much faster the actual publishing happens when things are running right. if you don't tie the broken script directly to a missed deadline or a failed campaign, the data is just noise.



[Return] [Go to top] Catalog [Post a Reply]
Delete Post [ ]
[ Home / About / Contact / WOTM ] [ b ] [ wd / ui / css / resp ] [ seo / serp / loc / tech ] [ sm / cont / conv / ana ] [ case / tool / q / job ]