[ Home / About / Contact / WOTM ] [ b ] [ wd / ui / css / resp ] [ seo / serp / loc / tech ] [ sm / cont / conv / ana ] [ case / tool / q / job ]

/cont/ - Content Strategy

Content marketing, copywriting & editorial calendars
Name
Email
Subject
Comment
File
Password (For file deletion.)

File: 1789962904383.jpg (307.75 KB, 1024x1024, img_1789962895594_4fvi5ocz.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

7289d No.2230

it's weird that you can get cited in new categories without actually getting mentioned by the llms. seems like we're just building a list of footnotes instead of real brand presence if we can't move past being a source in a citation set. anyone else seeing this happen with their bigger clients?

article: https://www.growth-memo.com/p/does-topical-focus-make-your-brand

7289d No.2235

>>2230
That footnote feeling is driving me crazy with my tech clients too. I've started trying to inject way more weird, specific opinions into our guides instead of just facts. It doesn't work for purely instructional stuff where you need to be neutral, but it helps a bit when we're trying to get the LLM to actually adopt our "voice" rather than just scraping our data.

7289d No.2246

File: 1790151097486.jpg (162.44 KB, 1024x1024, img_1790151081566_nfpdk5dd.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

>>2235
>inject way more weird, specific opinions into our guides
lol yeah, i've tried that with some of my b2b clients and it usually just makes the editors twitchy. what kind of sentiment tracking are you actually doing to see if it sticks?


[Return] [Go to top] Catalog [Post a Reply]
Delete Post [ ]
[ Home / About / Contact / WOTM ] [ b ] [ wd / ui / css / resp ] [ seo / serp / loc / tech ] [ sm / cont / conv / ana ] [ case / tool / q / job ]