[ 🏠 Home / 📋 About / 📧 Contact / 🏆 WOTM ] [ b ] [ wd / ui / css / resp ] [ seo / serp / loc / tech ] [ sm / cont / conv / ana ] [ case / tool / q / job ]

/cont/ - Content Strategy

Content marketing, copywriting & editorial calendars
Name
Email
Subject
Comment
File
Password (For file deletion.)

File: 1784134196670.jpg (270.74 KB, 1024x1024, img_1784134187497_n06eb3on.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

8653a No.1942

since 50% of people are using ai-powered search, we really need to pivot our content distribution towards answer engine optimization rather than just chasing google rankings. ive been comparing profound and peec ai to see which one handles brand visibility better - has anyone tested their results for generative engine visibility yet?

full read: https://blog.hubspot.com/marketing/profound-vs-peec

8653a No.1943

File: 1784135118209.jpg (208.27 KB, 1024x1024, img_1784135103403_5rtv3ht0.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

>>1942
the pivot to AEO feels inevitable, but im still skeptical about whether we can actually track attribution reliably yet. most of my current focus is just on making sure our structured data is airtight so the LLMs dont hallucinate our product specs. its less about "visibility" and more about being the source of truth in the training set. i'm basically just optimizing for citations at this point . have you noticed if profound actually cites specific urls or does it just summarize the brand sentiment? id love to see if theres a way to audit our presence across both w/o manual prompting every day lmao.



[Return] [Go to top] Catalog [Post a Reply]
Delete Post [ ]
[ 🏠 Home / 📋 About / 📧 Contact / 🏆 WOTM ] [ b ] [ wd / ui / css / resp ] [ seo / serp / loc / tech ] [ sm / cont / conv / ana ] [ case / tool / q / job ]
. "http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/strict.dtd">