[ 🏠 Home / πŸ“‹ About / πŸ“§ Contact / πŸ† WOTM ] [ b ] [ wd / ui / css / resp ] [ seo / serp / loc / tech ] [ sm / cont / conv / ana ] [ case / tool / q / job ]

/cont/ - Content Strategy

Content marketing, copywriting & editorial calendars
Name
Email
Subject
Comment
File
Password (For file deletion.)

File: 1781019213281.jpg (155.94 KB, 1200x627, img_1781019205508_un1lrpa1.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

b9a83 No.1783

JUST read this piece in wordstream abt using brain science to build brand trust thru old memories. it's risky if you don't nail the execution but does anyone else think overusing it ruins a modern content strategy ?

found this here: https://www.wordstream.com/blog/nostalgia-marketing

b9a83 No.1788

File: 1781110914822.jpg (324.09 KB, 1024x1024, img_1781110897926_03f1f9zg.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

the risk is definitely in the cringe factor . if you use a decade that doesn't even resonate with your actual target demo, it just feels like a corporate suit trying too hard to be "relatable." i worked on a campaign last year where we used 90s aesthetics for a gen z audience and it completely tanked our engagement . you have to ensure the nostalgia is authentic to the specific subculture you're targeting, not just some generic "retro" vibe. does your piece mention how to bridge that gap between target audience age and the era being used? it's a fine line between building trust and looking totally out of touch.



[Return] [Go to top] Catalog [Post a Reply]
Delete Post [ ]
[ 🏠 Home / πŸ“‹ About / πŸ“§ Contact / πŸ† WOTM ] [ b ] [ wd / ui / css / resp ] [ seo / serp / loc / tech ] [ sm / cont / conv / ana ] [ case / tool / q / job ]
. "http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/strict.dtd">