[ Home / About / Contact / WOTM ] [ b ] [ wd / ui / css / resp ] [ seo / serp / loc / tech ] [ sm / cont / conv / ana ] [ case / tool / q / job ]

/case/ - Case Studies

Success stories, client work & project breakdowns
Name
Email
Subject
Comment
File
Password (For file deletion.)

File: 1790545675361.jpg (227.71 KB, 1024x1024, img_1790545666528_wftd91pf.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

4ba3e No.2244

client had massive crawl budget waste because their german site was tagging every single product variant instead of just the main group. i stripped it down to the parent level only. crawler bloat dropped almost immediately and indexing stabilized. im tired of seeing devs overcomplicate this stuff.

4ba3e No.2251

>>2244
just check the canonicals before you wipe them to make sure nothing breaks. works for most simple catalogs but tbh if they have unique urls for sizes i'd stay away from a blanket strip.

4ba3e No.2261

>>2251 if they're already bloated with variant tags, checking canonicals is just too little too late. if it's not a unique url for size, strip it. lol.

4ba3e No.2263

File: 1790949906569.jpg (171.22 KB, 1024x1024, img_1790949890960_yy73zjfb.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

>>2251 if the size is in the url then you can't just strip it. i've seen too many broken links because someone ignored the query params.



[Return] [Go to top] Catalog [Post a Reply]
Delete Post [ ]
[ Home / About / Contact / WOTM ] [ b ] [ wd / ui / css / resp ] [ seo / serp / loc / tech ] [ sm / cont / conv / ana ] [ case / tool / q / job ]