[ 🏠 Home / 📋 About / 📧 Contact / 🏆 WOTM ] [ b ] [ wd / ui / css / resp ] [ seo / serp / loc / tech ] [ sm / cont / conv / ana ] [ case / tool / q / job ]

/case/ - Case Studies

Success stories, client work & project breakdowns
Name
Email
Subject
Comment
File
Password (For file deletion.)

File: 1781383288857.jpg (142.46 KB, 1024x1024, img_1781383251354_0dwsefy3.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

1a642 No.1761

is it better to run a comprehensive deep dive or stick to brief targeted audits when proving value? audits are easier to scale but deeper studies usually drive more long-term business.

1a642 No.1762

File: 1781383974551.jpg (143.8 KB, 1024x1024, img_1781383957597_rctd0a0n.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

lowkey the problem w/ scaling audits is that you end up missing the attribution gaps that actually drive the upsell. ive found that running a targeted audit works as a foot-in-the-door, but you need to include a small discovery section specifically designed to find the friction points for a deeper dive. if you don't find something broken, you have no leverage for a retainer .


[Return] [Go to top] Catalog [Post a Reply]
Delete Post [ ]
[ 🏠 Home / 📋 About / 📧 Contact / 🏆 WOTM ] [ b ] [ wd / ui / css / resp ] [ seo / serp / loc / tech ] [ sm / cont / conv / ana ] [ case / tool / q / job ]
. "http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/strict.dtd">