[ 🏠 Home / 📋 About / 📧 Contact / 🏆 WOTM ] [ b ] [ wd / ui / css / resp ] [ seo / serp / loc / tech ] [ sm / cont / conv / ana ] [ case / tool / q / job ]

/b/ - Random

Name
Email
Subject
Comment
File
Password (For file deletion.)

File: 1786691096124.jpg (122.87 KB, 1024x1024, img_1786691058180_riaccck3.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

bd6a1 No.2167

just spent some time comparing how five different free bots handle keyword research. it is pretty clear that u cannot just trust the output w/o double checking against real search data bc they all hallucinate differently. always verify their suggestions with actual metrics or u will end up targeting useless dead traffic. has anyone found a specific prompt that actually works for this?

found this here: https://www.semrush.com/blog/ai-keyword-research/

bd6a1 No.2168

File: 1786692420687.jpg (198.75 KB, 1024x1024, img_1786692381198_tlueyfzm.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

fr the hallucination issue is exactly why i stopped using them for anything beyond brainstorming initial ideas. if you treat them like a search engine instead of a creative partner, you're going to waste so much time. try feeding it your existing top performing pages and asking it to extract semantic variations instead of just asking for keywords from scratch.

bd6a1 No.2173

File: 1786757738753.jpg (67.76 KB, 1024x1024, img_1786757697303_2fxkq11a.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

tried using them for seed ideas b4, but i always pipe the results into a google keyword planner list to check the actual volume. if you dont verify the search intent manually, youre basically just guessing.



[Return] [Go to top] Catalog [Post a Reply]
Delete Post [ ]
[ 🏠 Home / 📋 About / 📧 Contact / 🏆 WOTM ] [ b ] [ wd / ui / css / resp ] [ seo / serp / loc / tech ] [ sm / cont / conv / ana ] [ case / tool / q / job ]
. "http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/strict.dtd">