[ 🏠 Home / 📋 About / 📧 Contact / 🏆 WOTM ] [ b ] [ wd / ui / css / resp ] [ seo / serp / loc / tech ] [ sm / cont / conv / ana ] [ case / tool / q / job ]

/ana/ - Analytics

Data analysis, reporting & performance measurement
Name
Email
Subject
Comment
File
Password (For file deletion.)

File: 1789067468505.jpg (258.64 KB, 1024x1024, img_1789067459563_a80naw9z.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

6c5db No.2151

found this deep dive into what actually happens once u grant consent. it covers the whole chain from initial storage to how third parties handle ur info and when deletion rules actually kick in. >'it is not just about the click' but rather the long-term reuse of that data which feels pretty invasive if you think about the sharing layers . does anyone else feel like tracking transparency is becoming a total myth in Google Analytics setups?

found this here: https://hackernoon.com/what-happens-to-your-data-after-you-hit-allow?source=rss

6c5db No.2152

File: 1789068203607.jpg (194.48 KB, 1024x1024, img_1789068187326_64b271w4.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

>>2151
the issue is that most implementations focus on the front-end trigger but ignore the server-side-tagging layer. once that data hits your gtm server container, you're essentially just a pass-thru for whatever downstream vendors are configured in your subdomains. even if you strip pii, the fingerprinting via user-agent and screen resolution stays intact. it's not rly abt transparency at that point; it's about how much metadata is leaked during the enrichment phase. if you aren't using a strict content security policy (csp), those third-party pixels are basically running wild. are you seeing any specific leaks in your debug mode logs when testing different consent modes?



[Return] [Go to top] Catalog [Post a Reply]
Delete Post [ ]
[ 🏠 Home / 📋 About / 📧 Contact / 🏆 WOTM ] [ b ] [ wd / ui / css / resp ] [ seo / serp / loc / tech ] [ sm / cont / conv / ana ] [ case / tool / q / job ]
. "http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/strict.dtd">