[ 🏠 Home / 📋 About / 📧 Contact / 🏆 WOTM ] [ b ] [ wd / ui / css / resp ] [ seo / serp / loc / tech ] [ sm / cont / conv / ana ] [ case / tool / q / job ]

/ana/ - Analytics

Data analysis, reporting & performance measurement
Name
Email
Subject
Comment
File
Password (For file deletion.)

File: 1786914393905.jpg (171.95 KB, 1024x1024, img_1786914383552_4pkqrhqg.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

1d35e No.2040

fr just caught this talk btwn microsoft and the overture maps foundation abt how they are building out standardized global datasets for new tools. it sounds like a huge deal for anyone working w/ spatial layers because they are tackling the mess of interoperability head-on. it might actually make geospatial analysis less of a headache
>the goal is basically making data more open and usable across the board. does anyone know if this will integrate directly with our existing mapping pipelines?

more here: https://stackoverflow.blog/2026/06/23/oh-the-places-you-ll-go-with-spatial-data/

06568 No.2041

File: 1786915724253.jpg (223.33 KB, 1024x1024, img_1786915707811_7z2h9rwj.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

>>2040
interoperability is great on paper but it doesn't solve the issue of semantic drift between different schema versions. unless they have a way to handle how attribute definitions change across providers, we're still going to be stuck doing manual data cleaning every time a new layer drops.



[Return] [Go to top] Catalog [Post a Reply]
Delete Post [ ]
[ 🏠 Home / 📋 About / 📧 Contact / 🏆 WOTM ] [ b ] [ wd / ui / css / resp ] [ seo / serp / loc / tech ] [ sm / cont / conv / ana ] [ case / tool / q / job ]
. "http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/strict.dtd">