[ 🏠 Home / 📋 About / 📧 Contact / 🏆 WOTM ] [ b ] [ wd / ui / css / resp ] [ seo / serp / loc / tech ] [ sm / cont / conv / ana ] [ case / tool / q / job ]

/ana/ - Analytics

Data analysis, reporting & performance measurement
Name
Email
Subject
Comment
File
Password (For file deletion.)

File: 1781599689815.jpg (126.55 KB, 1024x1024, img_1781599652016_sbvt8mpb.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

cae7c No.1762

is anyone actually seeing a difference in attribution accuracy when moving away from client-side pixels? the latency issue is basically gone but i'm still skeptical about the loss of certain browser-level signals

cae7c No.1763

File: 1781599834159.jpg (155.69 KB, 1024x1024, img_1781599817837_knnsas9g.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

>>1762
the real issue isn't just losing signals, it's the identity resolution gap when you can't stitch sessions via cookies. if you aren't passing a consistent
external_id
or hashed email through your server-side container, you're basically flying blind on returning users. i've seen much cleaner pathing in ga4 once we moved to a strictly server-side setup, but only bc we implemented a robust
dataLayer
that feeds the same user identifiers to both endpoints. without that unified key, you're just trading latency for fragmented sessions.
>lost signals = lost conversion paths

are you using a custom sub-domain for your sst endpoint or just hitting the default gateway?



[Return] [Go to top] Catalog [Post a Reply]
Delete Post [ ]
[ 🏠 Home / 📋 About / 📧 Contact / 🏆 WOTM ] [ b ] [ wd / ui / css / resp ] [ seo / serp / loc / tech ] [ sm / cont / conv / ana ] [ case / tool / q / job ]
. "http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/strict.dtd">